General info of Nvidia Quadro P2000 and Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Before we compare Nvidia Quadro P2000 vs Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000, Let’s see the specs of both. The Nvidia Quadro P2000 and Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 are both professional-grade graphics cards designed for use in workstations and servers. However, the Quadro RTX 4000 is a more powerful and feature-rich card than the Quadro P2000.
The Quadro RTX 4000 is based on Nvidia’s Turing architecture and features 2304 CUDA cores, 288 Tensor Cores, and 36 RT Cores. It also has 8GB of GDDR6 memory, a memory bandwidth of 416 GB/s, and a max power consumption of 160 watts. The Quadro RTX 4000 supports ray tracing and deep learning, making it suitable for use in applications such as AI, VR, and 3D rendering.
On the other hand, the Quadro P2000 is based on the Pascal architecture and features 1024 CUDA cores and 5GB of GDDR5 memory. It has a memory bandwidth of 140 GB/s and a maximum power consumption of 75 watts. While the Quadro P2000 is a capable card, it lacks the advanced features of the Quadro RTX 4000.
In terms of performance, the Quadro RTX 4000 is significantly faster than the Quadro P2000 in most applications, thanks to its more powerful architecture and additional features. However, it is also significantly more expensive than the Quadro P2000, so it may not be necessary for all users. Ultimately, the choice between these two cards will depend on the user’s specific needs and budget. GPU architecture, market segment, value for money, and other general parameters compared.
Nvidia Quadro P2000 vs Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000
Detail | RTX 4000 | P2000 |
Place in performance rating | 73 | 236 |
Value for money | 12.03 | 8.55 |
Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Pascal (2016−2021) |
GPU code name | TU104 | GP106 |
Market segment | Workstation | Workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2018 (4 years old) | 6 February 2017 (6 years old) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | $585 |
Current price | $1194 (1.3x MSRP) | $381 (0.7x MSRP) |
Technical specs
It’s important to look at the technical specs of a graphics card to get an idea of its performance – things like the number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing, and calculation speed. However, if you want to know how it’ll perform, it’s best to take a look at benchmark and gaming test results. Just be aware that the power consumption can exceed the nominal TDP, particularly if it’s been overclocked!
Detail | RTX 4000 | P2000 |
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2304 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1076 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1545 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Number of transistors | 13,600 million | 4,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal design power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 222.5 | 94.72 |
Floating-point performance | no data | 3,031 gflops |
Size & Compatibility
Making sure all your components are compatible is key! For graphics cards, you’ll want to check the interface and bus to make sure it’s compatible with your motherboard, as well as any additional power connectors to ensure your power supply is up to the task.
Detail | RTX 4000 | P2000 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 241 mm | 201 mm |
Width | 1-slot | 1-slot |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory
VRAM is an important factor when it comes to graphics performance. It comes in different types, sizes, buses, clocks, and bandwidths. If you’re using an integrated GPU, there’s no dedicated VRAM, so it’ll just use a portion of your system RAM.
Detail | RTX 4000 | P2000 |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Max RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 160 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 13000 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 416.0 GB/s | 140.2 GB/s |
Video outputs and ports
GPUs come with a variety of video connectors. Usually, the data here is only accurate for desktop reference cards (like NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). Note that OEMs can change the number and type of output ports. On the other hand, laptop cards may have different video output ports depending on the laptop model.
Detail | RTX 4000 | P2000 |
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 4x DisplayPort |
API support
List of supported APIs, including specific versions.
Detail | RTX 4000 | P2000 |
Direct X | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Open GL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Open CL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | + |
CUDA | 7.5 | 6.1 |
Benchmark performance
Comparing performance outside of gaming? We’ve got you covered! Check out the scores on our non-gaming benchmark – rated from 0-100 – and see how your setup stacks up.
Overall score
Our benchmark performance rating is constantly getting better and better! If you notice any discrepancies, let us know in the comments section – we’re usually quick to address any issues.
RTX 4000 | 38.98 +113% |
P2000 | 18.33 |
Passmark
This benchmark is a staple of the Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It puts your graphics card to the test with four different Direct3D versions (9, 10, 11, and 12, with the last one done in 4K resolution if possible) and a few more tests that take advantage of DirectCompute capabilities. It’s a great way to get an overall 24% coverage of your graphics card’s performance.
RTX 4000 | 15453 +113% |
P2000 | 7268 |
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is the go-to benchmark for testing your graphics card’s power. It’s made up of 11 different tests that put your GPU to the test – no 3D rendering required! Plus, it uses the Open CL API from the Khronos Group, giving you a comprehensive 8% coverage of your card’s performance.
RTX 4000 | 83613 +307% |
P2000 | 20562 |
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
Geekbench 5 is a widely used graphics card benchmark that tests your GPU’s processing power with 11 different scenarios — all without any 3D rendering. This version uses the Vulkan API from AMD & Khronos Group, so you can be sure you’re getting a comprehensive 5% coverage of the benchmark. So if you’re looking for a casual way to measure your GPU performance, Geekbench 5 is the way to go!
RTX 4000 | 84855 +252% |
P2000 | 24130 |
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Geekbench 5 is an awesome graphics card benchmark that puts your GPU’s power to the test! It’s made up of 11 different tests that make use of your GPU’s processing power without any 3D rendering. Plus, it’s powered by NVIDIA’s CUDA API – so you know you’re getting the best! With coverage of 4%, it’s the perfect way to get a good gauge of your GPU’s performance.
RTX 4000 | 94250 +335% |
P2000 | 21668 |
Mining hash rates
The Quadro RTX 4000 and Quadro P2000 are both top-notch when it comes to cryptocurrency mining performance. They can churn out mega hashes per second like no other!
Detail | RTX 4000 | P2000 |
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | no data | 0.19 kh/s |
Gaming performance
Let’s take a look at how well these two graphics cards stack up when it comes to gaming. We can measure their performance in terms of frames per second (FPS) in various gaming benchmarks.
Average FPS
Check out these awesome frame rates for some of the most popular games out there! Across different resolutions, you can expect these average frames per second. Get ready for some smooth gaming!
Detail | RTX 4000 | P2000 |
Full HD | No data | 57 |
1440p | No data | 20 |
4K | No data | 16 |
P5000 vs P2000 vs RTX Quadro 4000 by video
Frequently asked questions (FAQ) about Quadro RTX 4000 and P2000
Which is better Quadro or RTX?
Both Quadro and RTX are product lines of graphics cards designed and manufactured by Nvidia. However, Quadro is primarily intended for professional use in fields such as architecture, engineering, and design, while RTX is targeted at both professionals and gamers.
Quadro cards typically have more memory and higher precision for handling complex calculations required in professional applications such as CAD, 3D modeling, and simulations. They also tend to have more optimized drivers and software tools for these applications.
On the other hand, RTX cards offer cutting-edge features such as real-time ray tracing, deep learning, and AI-based rendering. These features can greatly enhance the visual quality of games and other applications that utilize them.
Ultimately, the choice between Quadro and RTX depends on your specific needs and use case. If you require maximum precision and optimized software for professional applications, Quadro may be the better choice. If you want to take advantage of the latest features for both gaming and professional use, RTX may be the better option.
What is the difference between Quadro 2000d and Quadro 4000?
Quadro 2000D and Quadro 4000 have some differences in terms of performance and specifications.
The Quadro 2000D is an older model and is based on the Fermi architecture. It has 192 CUDA cores, a core clock speed of 625 MHz, and 1 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 128-bit memory interface. It supports a maximum resolution of 2560 x 1600 pixels and has a maximum power consumption of 62 watts.
The Quadro 4000, on the other hand, is based on the newer Kepler architecture. It has 256 CUDA cores, a core clock speed of 475 MHz, and 2 GB of GDDR5 memory with a 256-bit memory interface. It supports a maximum resolution of 3840 x 2160 pixels and has a maximum power consumption of 142 watts.
Overall, the Quadro 4000 offers better performance than the Quadro 2000D, with more CUDA cores, higher memory bandwidth, and support for higher resolutions. However, it also consumes more power and may be more expensive than the older model.
Advantages and disadvantages Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 and P2000
Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 and P2000 are professional graphics cards designed for use in workstations and desktops, with a focus on performance and reliability for demanding tasks such as computer-aided design (CAD), 3D modeling, and scientific simulations. Here are some of the advantages and disadvantages of each card:
Advantages of Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000:
- High performance: The Quadro RTX 4000 offers a significant boost in performance compared to its predecessor, the Quadro P4000, with up to 43% faster performance in certain workloads.
- Ray tracing: The RTX 4000 includes dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing, enabling highly realistic lighting and reflections in 3D graphics.
- AI acceleration: The RTX 4000 also includes Tensor Cores for AI acceleration, allowing for faster machine learning and deep learning workflows.
- Large memory: The RTX 4000 comes with 8GB of GDDR6 memory, which allows for the handling of large and complex datasets.
- VR support: The RTX 4000 supports virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) applications, making it ideal for use in industries such as architecture and engineering.
Disadvantages of Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000:
- Price: The RTX 4000 is relatively expensive compared to other graphics cards in its class, which may be a consideration for budget-conscious users.
- Power consumption: The RTX 4000 consumes more power than the Quadro P2000, which may be a concern for users with limited power supplies.
Advantages of Nvidia Quadro P2000:
- Affordability: The P2000 is more affordable than the RTX 4000, making it a good choice for users on a budget.
- Low power consumption: The P2000 is more power-efficient than the RTX 4000, making it a good choice for users with limited power supplies.
- Large memory: The P2000 comes with 5GB of GDDR5 memory, which is ample for most professional applications.
- VR support: The P2000 supports VR and AR applications, making it ideal for use in industries such as architecture and engineering.
Disadvantages of Nvidia Quadro P2000:
- Performance: The P2000 is not as powerful as the RTX 4000, which may limit its performance in more demanding workloads.
- No hardware ray tracing: The P2000 does not include dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing, which may limit its usefulness in certain 3D graphics workflows.
In summary, the Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 is a high-performance and feature-rich graphics card, while the Quadro P2000 is a more affordable and power-efficient option. The choice between the two will depend on the user’s specific needs and budget.